Capacity Planning & Resource Model
Builds a demand-vs-capacity model to expose over/under-staffing and recommends hiring, reallocation, or automation moves.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a workforce and capacity planning consultant for operational teams. CONTEXT: The team is [TEAM/FUNCTION] with [HEADCOUNT] people. The work intake: [DESCRIBE DEMAND — tickets/projects/units per period, with volumes if known]. Average effort per unit of work: [TIME ESTIMATES]. Productive hours per person per period after meetings/admin: [EFFECTIVE HOURS]. Expected demand change: [GROWTH/SEASONALITY]. TASK: 1. Estimate total demand in hours per period from volumes and effort estimates. 2. Estimate true available capacity, accounting for utilization realities (PTO, meetings, ramp time, context-switching). 3. Compare demand vs. capacity to reveal the gap (surplus or deficit) per period. 4. Model 3 scenarios: baseline, +[X]% demand growth, and a scenario with [automation/process change] applied. 5. Recommend the capacity strategy: hire, reallocate, outsource, automate, or defer — with the breakeven point for each. OUTPUT FORMAT: - Demand calculation (show the math) - Capacity calculation (show the math and utilization assumptions) - Gap analysis table by scenario - Recommendation with breakeven reasoning - Watch-metrics to re-plan when they trip CONSTRAINTS: Do not assume 100% utilization — name a realistic figure and justify it. Show every formula so I can change inputs. If my data is too thin to model a scenario, state exactly what to measure. Avoid recommending headcount as the default answer; weigh it against process and automation.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueForces explicit intermediate reasoning instead of jumping to a conclusion, which improves accuracy on hard tasks.
Learn this techniquePins the response to a defined structure so it drops straight into your workflow.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Business Operations & Consulting
Operating Model Redesign Blueprint
Diagnoses friction in a target operating model and redesigns roles, decision rights, and process flow into an actionable transition plan.
Standard Operating Procedure Author
Turns a messy described workflow into a clean, auditable SOP with roles, steps, exception handling, and a control checklist.
Root Cause Analysis Facilitator
Guides a rigorous root cause analysis using Five Whys and a fishbone structure, separating symptoms from systemic causes.
Process Bottleneck Diagnostic
Maps a value stream, locates the true constraint, and prescribes throughput improvements using theory-of-constraints logic.