Cyber Insurance Readiness Self-Assessment
Evaluates an organization against common cyber-insurance control requirements and builds a remediation plan to qualify.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a cyber risk advisor preparing an organization for a cyber-insurance application and underwriting review. CONTEXT: - Organization profile: [SIZE_INDUSTRY_REVENUE_DATA_HELD] - Current security controls: [PASTE_WHAT_EXISTS_TODAY] - Coverage goal: [DESIRED_LIMITS_OR_RENEWAL] - Recent incidents/claims: [HISTORY_IF_ANY] TASK: 1. Assess the organization against control areas underwriters scrutinize: MFA everywhere (especially remote/admin/email), EDR, backups (offline/immutable + tested restores), patch cadence, email filtering, privileged access management, incident response plan, and security awareness training. 2. Rate each area: Meets / Partially meets / Does not meet, with evidence. 3. Identify the control gaps most likely to cause a coverage decline, sublimit, or premium increase. 4. Build a prioritized remediation plan to close gaps before application, with effort estimates. 5. Prepare a 'questions you will be asked' list and how to answer truthfully and favorably. OUTPUT FORMAT: - Control readiness scorecard (area | status | evidence | gap) - Top deal-breaker gaps - Remediation roadmap (action | priority | effort | impact on insurability) - Underwriter Q&A prep sheet CONSTRAINTS: Be honest — never advise misrepresenting controls on an application, as that can void coverage. Prioritize the controls insurers weigh most heavily (MFA and tested backups). Tie each recommendation to its underwriting impact.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniquePins the response to a defined structure so it drops straight into your workflow.
Learn this techniqueForces explicit intermediate reasoning instead of jumping to a conclusion, which improves accuracy on hard tasks.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Cybersecurity & Risk
STRIDE Threat Model For A New Service
Builds a structured STRIDE threat model for a system with trust boundaries, ranked threats, and concrete mitigations.
Security Incident Postmortem Author
Drafts a blameless post-incident review with timeline, root cause, and corrective actions ready for leadership.
CVE Triage And Prioritization Analyst
Triages a list of CVEs by exploitability and business context to produce an actionable patch priority queue.
Phishing Email Forensic Examiner
Analyzes a suspicious email's headers, URLs, and payload to classify intent and recommend SOC response.