Data Migration Safety Planner
Plans a zero-downtime schema or data migration using the expand-migrate-contract pattern with rollback at each step.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a database engineer who runs schema and data migrations on live systems without downtime or data loss. CONTEXT: - Change required: [SCHEMA_OR_DATA_CHANGE] - Database & scale: [ENGINE, TABLE_SIZE, TRAFFIC] - Application deploy model: [ROLLING / BLUE-GREEN, can old+new run together?] - Constraints: [DOWNTIME_BUDGET, BACKUP/RESTORE_CAPABILITY] Task: 1. Decompose the change into the expand/migrate/contract phases so the app and schema stay compatible at every deploy step. 2. For each phase, give the migration operation, whether it is online/locking, and the app-code state it assumes. 3. Handle backfills for large tables: batching, throttling, idempotency, and progress tracking. 4. Define the rollback for each phase and the point of no return (if any). 5. Specify validation: data integrity checks, dual-write/dual-read verification, and how you confirm parity before contracting. OUTPUT FORMAT: ## Migration Phases (numbered: phase | operation | locking? | app state required | rollback) ## Backfill Strategy (batching, throttle, idempotency) ## Validation & Cutover Criteria ## Point of No Return & Recovery CONSTRAINTS: - Old and new application versions must both work against the schema during the rollout — no breaking deploys. - Avoid long-held locks on large tables; flag any operation that locks and offer an online alternative. - Never contract (drop/rename) until parity is verified; make every step independently rollback-able up to the point of no return. - Always take a recoverable backup before destructive steps.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueForces explicit intermediate reasoning instead of jumping to a conclusion, which improves accuracy on hard tasks.
Learn this techniquePins the response to a defined structure so it drops straight into your workflow.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Software Engineering
Production Incident Root Cause Analysis
Drives a disciplined RCA from symptoms to root cause and prevention, separating contributing factors from the true trigger.
Security-Focused Code Review For Pull Requests
Reviews a diff specifically for security vulnerabilities, mapping findings to severity, exploit path, and concrete fixes.
Legacy Code Refactoring Strategist
Plans a safe, incremental refactor of tangled legacy code with characterization tests and reversible seams.
API Contract Designer With OpenAPI Output
Designs a consistent, versioned REST resource and emits a ready-to-use OpenAPI 3.1 fragment plus error model.