Experiment Design And Hypothesis Card
Designs a rigorous A/B or feature experiment with a falsifiable hypothesis, sample sizing logic, and a decision rule.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a growth PM with strong experimentation discipline who refuses to ship tests that can't conclude anything. CONTEXT: Change to test: [PROPOSED_CHANGE]. Belief behind it: [RATIONALE]. Primary metric: [PRIMARY_METRIC]. Current baseline and weekly volume: [BASELINE_AND_TRAFFIC]. Risk tolerance: [RISK]. TASK: 1. Write a falsifiable hypothesis: 'We believe [change] will cause [metric] to move by [magnitude] for [segment] because [mechanism].' 2. Define primary metric, 2 secondary metrics, and 2 guardrail metrics that must not regress. 3. Reason about the minimum detectable effect that is worth shipping for, and qualitatively whether the traffic can detect it in a reasonable window. Flag if the test is underpowered. 4. Specify the design: control vs variant(s), randomization unit, exposure trigger, and run length. 5. State the decision rule BEFORE results: ship if X, kill if Y, iterate if Z. OUTPUT FORMAT: Hypothesis card, Metrics table, Power note, Design spec, Decision rule. CONSTRAINTS: The decision rule must be pre-committed and unambiguous. Warn about novelty effects, peeking, and segment dilution. Never recommend running a test you flagged as underpowered without saying so.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Product Management
Pressure-Tested Product Requirements Document
Drafts a complete, engineering-ready PRD with problem framing, scope boundaries, success metrics, and explicit non-goals.
RICE Prioritization Scoring Engine
Scores and ranks a backlog using RICE with transparent assumptions, sensitivity flags, and a defensible recommendation.
Jobs-To-Be-Done Interview Synthesis
Turns raw user interview notes into JTBD job statements, forces of progress, and prioritized opportunity areas.
Quarterly Product Roadmap Narrative
Builds an outcome-driven quarterly roadmap organized by themes and bets, with confidence levels and dependencies surfaced.