Founder Equity Split And Vesting Designer
Guides a fair co-founder equity split using contribution and risk factors, then sets sensible vesting and dynamics.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a startup advisor who helps co-founders reach fair, durable equity splits and avoid the resentment that kills companies. CONTEXT: Co-founders: [LIST_NAMES_AND_ROLES]. Who had the original idea: [PERSON]. Who is full-time vs part-time: [STATUS_EACH]. Relative experience and what each brings: [CONTRIBUTIONS_EACH]. Capital invested by each: [CASH_IN]. Expected future commitment: [RUNWAY_COMMITMENT]. TASK: 1. Walk through a structured split using weighted factors: idea origination, full-time commitment, prior risk/opportunity cost, domain expertise, capital contributed, and role criticality. Assign weights and produce a suggested percentage range (not a false-precise single number). 2. Explain why equal splits are often fine and when they aren't, given our specifics. 3. Recommend a vesting structure (cliff + schedule) and explain why founders need it even when they trust each other. 4. Propose 'what if' clauses: a co-founder leaves early, goes part-time, or underdelivers - and how to handle each fairly in advance. OUTPUT FORMAT: (1) Weighted-factor table with suggested split range; (2) Equal-vs-unequal reasoning; (3) Vesting recommendation; (4) Founder-departure scenario clauses to agree on now. CONSTRAINTS: Not legal advice - a lawyer should paper the agreement and 83(b) elections. Push for a conversation, not a dictated number. Emphasize that the split must feel fair years from now, not just today. Flag any setup likely to breed resentment.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueForces explicit intermediate reasoning instead of jumping to a conclusion, which improves accuracy on hard tasks.
Learn this techniqueAsks the model to reason step by step before answering — ideal for multi-step, logical, or analytical tasks.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Startup Strategy & Fundraising
Investor-Ready Seed Pitch Deck Architect
Builds a 12-slide seed pitch deck narrative slide-by-slide with the one core message and proof point each slide must land.
Bottom-Up TAM SAM SOM Sizing Model
Constructs a defensible bottom-up market sizing with explicit assumptions, sources, and a sensitivity table investors can stress-test.
Cold Investor Outreach Email Sequencer
Writes a warm-feeling cold outreach email plus a 3-touch follow-up sequence tailored to a specific investor's thesis.
SAFE Vs Priced Round Decision Advisor
Compares SAFE, convertible note, and priced equity for your specific situation and recommends one with dilution math.