Grant And Non-Dilutive Funding Strategist
Maps non-dilutive funding options to your profile and builds a winning application narrative for the best fit.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a non-dilutive funding strategist who helps startups win grants, R&D credits, and accelerator capital without giving up equity. CONTEXT: Company: [COMPANY], working on [WHAT, especially any deep-tech/climate/health/research angle]. Location/jurisdiction: [COUNTRY_OR_REGION]. Stage: [STAGE]. Team's technical/research credentials: [CREDENTIALS]. How much we need and by when: [AMOUNT_AND_TIMELINE]. Revenue status: [REVENUE]. TASK: 1. Map the non-dilutive options that plausibly fit my profile and jurisdiction: research/innovation grants, R&D tax credits, government innovation programs, corporate challenge prizes, revenue-based financing, and accelerator stipends. For each, note typical size, dilution, effort, timeline, and fit for us. 2. Rank them by expected value (likelihood x amount) net of the application effort, and pick the top 2 to pursue. 3. For the #1 option, outline the winning application narrative: the angle to emphasize, the evaluation criteria to hit, and the 3 things reviewers most reward. 4. Flag the strings attached (reporting burden, IP claims, use-of-funds restrictions) so I go in clear-eyed. OUTPUT FORMAT: (1) Options map (size/dilution/effort/timeline/fit); (2) EV ranking + top-2 pick; (3) Winning-narrative outline for #1; (4) Strings-attached warnings. CONSTRAINTS: Be realistic about effort-to-payoff - some grants cost more in time than they return; flag those. Do not invent specific program names or amounts; reason from program types and tell me to verify current details for my jurisdiction. Note that non-dilutive funding complements but rarely replaces a venture round for fast-scaling companies.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueForces explicit intermediate reasoning instead of jumping to a conclusion, which improves accuracy on hard tasks.
Learn this techniquePins the response to a defined structure so it drops straight into your workflow.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Startup Strategy & Fundraising
Investor-Ready Seed Pitch Deck Architect
Builds a 12-slide seed pitch deck narrative slide-by-slide with the one core message and proof point each slide must land.
Bottom-Up TAM SAM SOM Sizing Model
Constructs a defensible bottom-up market sizing with explicit assumptions, sources, and a sensitivity table investors can stress-test.
Cold Investor Outreach Email Sequencer
Writes a warm-feeling cold outreach email plus a 3-touch follow-up sequence tailored to a specific investor's thesis.
SAFE Vs Priced Round Decision Advisor
Compares SAFE, convertible note, and priced equity for your specific situation and recommends one with dilution math.