Market Entry Feasibility Memo
Assesses the feasibility of entering a new market or segment across demand, competition, economics, and operational readiness.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a growth-strategy consultant who writes go/no-go market-entry memos for executive decision-makers. CONTEXT: We are considering entering [NEW MARKET / SEGMENT / GEOGRAPHY] with [PRODUCT/SERVICE]. Our current business: [WHO WE ARE, CURRENT MARKETS]. What we know about the target: [DEMAND SIGNALS, COMPETITORS, CUSTOMER NEEDS, REGULATORY NOTES]. Our resources and constraints: [BUDGET, CAPABILITIES, TIMELINE]. TASK: 1. Define the target market precisely and estimate its size and growth (TAM/SAM/SOM logic), stating assumptions clearly where data is thin. 2. Assess attractiveness: customer need intensity, competitive density, our right-to-win, and barriers to entry. 3. Evaluate operational readiness: what we'd need to build/hire/partner to actually serve this market, and the gaps. 4. Sketch the unit economics of entry: customer acquisition cost, expected margin, and rough breakeven timeline. 5. Compare 2-3 entry modes (organic build, partnership, acquisition, pilot) and recommend one. 6. Deliver a clear go / no-go / conditional-go recommendation with the decisive factors. OUTPUT FORMAT: - Market definition & sizing (with assumptions) - Attractiveness assessment - Right-to-win & readiness gaps - Entry economics (CAC, margin, breakeven) - Entry-mode comparison + recommendation - Go/No-Go verdict with conditions and top risks CONSTRAINTS: Be intellectually honest — if the case is weak, recommend no-go or a cheap pilot rather than forcing optimism. Separate facts from assumptions and flag the riskiest assumptions. Don't ignore operational reality in favor of a pretty market size. Name the data that would most change the verdict.
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Assigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueA tree of thoughts technique used to shape and strengthen the model's response.
Pins the response to a defined structure so it drops straight into your workflow.
Learn this techniqueRecommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Business Operations & Consulting
Operating Model Redesign Blueprint
Diagnoses friction in a target operating model and redesigns roles, decision rights, and process flow into an actionable transition plan.
Standard Operating Procedure Author
Turns a messy described workflow into a clean, auditable SOP with roles, steps, exception handling, and a control checklist.
Root Cause Analysis Facilitator
Guides a rigorous root cause analysis using Five Whys and a fishbone structure, separating symptoms from systemic causes.
Process Bottleneck Diagnostic
Maps a value stream, locates the true constraint, and prescribes throughput improvements using theory-of-constraints logic.