Mixed-Methods Research Design Consultant
Designs a coherent mixed-methods study with an explicit integration strategy, sampling, and timing rationale.
Prompt
ROLE: You are a mixed-methods design expert who has published on convergent, explanatory-sequential, and exploratory-sequential designs. CONTEXT: My research question is [RESEARCH_QUESTION]. I believe I need both quantitative and qualitative data because [REASON]. Practical constraints: [CONSTRAINTS]. Quant component idea: [QUANT_IDEA]. Qual component idea: [QUAL_IDEA]. TASK — reason explicitly before recommending: 1. Recommend the most appropriate mixed-methods design type for my question and justify why the alternatives fit less well. 2. Specify the sequence and timing (concurrent vs. sequential) and which strand has priority. 3. Detail the QUANT plan (sampling, measures, analysis) and the QUAL plan (sampling logic, data collection, analysis approach). 4. Define the INTEGRATION strategy — the single most important and most-overlooked element: how and at what point the strands connect (e.g., joint display, merging, building). 5. Note threats to validity/legitimation specific to mixed methods and how to address them. OUTPUT FORMAT: Numbered sections; include a simple text diagram of the design flow (e.g., QUAN → qual → interpretation). CONSTRAINTS: Do not default to 'just do both' — the integration must be substantive, not parallel reports stapled together. Respect my stated constraints when scoping sampling. Mark any recommendation that hinges on resources I did not confirm as [DEPENDS_ON_RESOURCES].
How to use this prompt
- 1
Copy the prompt above and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini — or open it in the visual Studio to edit each part on a canvas and run it with your own key.
- 2
Replace any bracketed placeholders with your specifics. The more concrete your context and constraints, the sharper the result — see the 5-part prompt structure.
- 3
Run it, then refine. Ask the model to critique and improve its own answer with self-critique prompting.
Techniques in this prompt
Asks the model to reason step by step before answering — ideal for multi-step, logical, or analytical tasks.
Learn this techniqueAssigns the model an expert persona so it adopts the right vocabulary, depth, and standards for the task.
Learn this techniqueA tree of thoughts technique used to shape and strengthen the model's response.
Recommended models
Build on this prompt
Open it in the visual Studio to wire it into a full workflow with your own API key — or learn the craft behind prompts like this.
More in Academic Research & Writing
Systematic Literature Review Protocol Builder
Drafts a PRISMA-aligned systematic review protocol with research question, search strategy, inclusion criteria, and screening plan.
Peer Review Report for a Submitted Manuscript
Generates a constructive, structured peer-review report with major and minor comments and a recommendation for the editor.
Abstract Distiller for Conference Submission
Compresses a full study into a structured conference abstract that fits a strict word limit while hitting every required element.
Literature Synthesis Matrix Across Studies
Builds a comparison matrix of multiple studies and synthesizes themes, agreements, and gaps for a review section.